Windows XP, The New DOS

Windows XP is the new DOS. A piece of legacy software which hangs around forever and elicits a “I had no idea companies still used XP” reaction from the new IT guy, twenty years after it was supposed to be replaced by something better.

Why A Draw Is As Good As A Win, But Not Really

Despite all the odds Australia has managed to lose the 1st Test.

They didn’t technically lose of course, no, it was a draw, but they will feel like they’ve lost, and England, as they sit in their dressing rooms patting themselves on the back, will feel like they’ve won.

Such is Cricket. When you’re on-top for the whole game and then it finishes in a draw, it’s almost more deflating than if you had’ve lost outright by 500 runs. Losing when you should have fun, isn’t fun.

The unfortunate thing for England is this. Although they might feel like they’ve won this game, they haven’t got buckley’s to show for it in the way of individual performances. As a team they might well feel like they’ve one, but as individuals, they were all losers in this game, and are in very poor shape going into the next Test.

England should bring in Steve Harmison for the next game. Apart from Flintoff their bowling is about as intimidating as a decapitated rubber duck. With Flintoff at one end and Harmison at the other,  it’ll give the Aussies something to think about.

Ashes to Ashes, England to Dust

The only thing that will save England from a great walloping in the 1st Test is if the heavens open and large buckets of water descend onto the ground in an disorderly fashion for a decent part of the 5th day. Not the prettiest way to save a Test match, but England has clearly decided it’s their best bet.

Starting the 4th day with little hope of winning, but a good chance of getting a draw and some much needed momentum going into the 2nd Test at Lord’s,  England quickly made it clear that they weren’t much interested in doing anything other than sulking in the field and waiting for the rain to come and save them from the onslaught.

Opening the bowling with Anderson and Broad was a peculiar decision, given that the new ball wasn’t too far off and the pitch was a spinners paradise — which is handy, since you’ve got two full-time spinners in your team, for the specific purpose of bowling them on this dusty pitch… but never-mind, details, details.

To say that England’s performance on the 4th day was lacklustre, is an understatement. One got the feeling that they’d rather be at home, eating ice cream, and playing on their XBOX, rather than playing Test cricket. If only they weren’t International Cricketers, they could have taken their ball and gone home. But alas, they are International Cricketers, so we had to witness two sessions of fully grown men, sulking like School children — who’ve just been told off for stealing a cookie — wishing that the rain would just bloody well hurry up and arrive already.

England: it’s time to stop sulking, drink some concrete, and harden the f**k up.

Turnbull, you goose…

From theage.com.au today:

“The case that Mr Rudd misled the house about the communication is not sustained,” he told ABC Radio on Tuesday.

An election before the end of the year is looking even more likely.

Google Trims The Fat, Gets Serious

January 14th, 2009, marks the day that Google grew up.

In a coordinated series of blog postings Google announced its intention to scuttle a number of its poor performing products, let go of some staff and close some of its offices — showing that in 2009 it intends to focus on keeping costs down and make money. A wise decision in the current economic climate.

Some of the announcements from Google:

Danny Sullivan has a more detailed round-up of today’s changes at Google.

Who knows what 2009 will hold for tech companies, but it goes without saying that whatever happens will be closely tied to what happens in the general economy.

There is (was?) a bubble in Silicon Valley — a bubble of innocence — and unfortunately 2009 looks like the year that will pop it.

Internet Speeds In Australia

Not only is broadband expensive in Australia, but it is also slow. Slow, as in painfully-slow. In comparison to other developed countries like America, Sweden, Japan, South Korea and so on, it is appalling. But what is really annoying about all of this is that it is not necessary — our Internet connection speeds are stuck in the 90’s because Telstra has a near complete monopoly on Australia’s broadband infrastructure and they aren’t afraid to use that advantage for profit and anti-competitive purposes.

As Stilgherrian explains in today’s Crikey, Telstra has the means to provide faster and cheaper broadband, but unless someone tries to compete with them, they won’t increase speeds or lower prices — without real competition, they have no incentive to.

How does Telstra do it quicker? By quietly stashing away its secret weapons, ready to be unleashed when a competitor tried to deploy their own big guns. Remember how Telstra didn’t sell ADSL2+ broadband, even from exchanges where equipment was already installed, until ISPs like iiNet started selling their own ADSL2+?

Confused about Australia’s broadband infrastructure? From the Telstra entry Wikipedia:

Due to Telstra’s position as Australia’s incumbent telecommunications provider, Telstra Wholesale is the incumbent and dominant wholesaler of ADSL services to other Internet Service Providers. Telstra installed the first DSLAMs in exchanges prior to 2000, and began wholesaling access in late 2000.[21] Telstra Wholesale has a comprehensive network of ADSL DSLAMs (the largest in Australia) and allows competitors access to each Telstra DSLAM at ADSL1 speeds.

So because Telstra owns the broadband infrastructure they can wholesale sell access to it to other companies — other companies which then sell the broadband connections to retail customers — but, not content with simple wholesale sales, Telstra has another division which sells these same broadband connections directly to the same retail customers. Which raises the question, how do you compete in a market where the biggest player owns all of the pieces on the board?

As Duncan Riley suggests, Telstra’s retail and wholesale arms must be separated for the common good.

Structural separation, as I’ve always argued is the only solution. Telstra retail and wholesale must be split for the common good. If we have the capacity to provide 100mbps connections in capital cities now, it SHOULD BE PROVIDED NOW, not in a year or two when Telstra decides to use it to undermine the competition.

They should absolutely be completely separate companies. The current setup is completely anti-competitive and is a disservice to the Australia public. Broadband is a utility and the Government should make sure that it is managed like one.

Can we stop living in the dark ages now?

My Favourite Podcasts From 2008

I got into podcasts in a big way in 2008. I find them a great way of ensuring that I go outside for an hour+ long walk or run everyday — even when it’s -11 and snowing as it was today. 

All of them are highly recommended!

The ‘Twitter Becomes Useful‘ Tipping Point, Where Is It?

I’ll admit it upfront: I’m a lousy Twitterer. I try to give it a go every month or so by tweeting frequently, replying to other peoples tweets and generally participating, but then I usually drop off the face of the twitter-earth within a day or two — mostly because I find that it consumes too much time and is too great a distraction – with little or no reward (for me at least).

I’d give it up completely if it weren’t for the fact that a lot of people seem to find it really useful – or maybe it’s only the Silicon Valley types that find it useful and everyone else just finds it fun. But either way, it’s getting a lot of attention.

So what’s the magic formula that makes it useful/fun? Only follow people you know? Only follow a small number of people so that you don’t get snowed under? Spend all day doing nothing but twittering?

What I’m looking for is the tipping point of Twitter – note that I’m not talking in terms of when Twitter hits a critical mass of users and breaks out and becomes a raging world-wide success overnight – but rather what is the tipping point for when Twitter actually becomes useful to you. When you get the balance right – so that you’re following the right number of people, have found a balance between getting work done and twittering – and find Twitter more useful than, you know, not useful.

So, the Twitter becomes useful tipping point, where is it?

Russian Professor (ex KGB) Predicts End of U.S.

Russian academic Igor Panarin thinks that the U.S., as we currently know it, will cease to exist in 2010 — torn apart by civil war:

Mr. Panarin posits, in brief, that mass immigration, economic decline, and moral degradation will trigger a civil war next fall and the collapse of the dollar. Around the end of June 2010, or early July, he says, the U.S. will break into six pieces — with Alaska reverting to Russian control.

Ha, yep, good luck with that prediction – especially the Alaska part. He obviously hasn’t heard of Sarah Palin has he?

Divided States

Source (WSJ): As if Things Weren’t Bad Enough, Russian Professor Predicts End of U.S.

Bolts Sense Drowned*

I know Bolt doesn’t like to let facts or reason get in the way of his daily diatribes — and as a general rule, I leave most of his nonsense alone. But this bizarre referral to the below graph as evidence that we — silly global warming alarmists — shouldn’t worry about rising sea levels because they haven’t risen in the past couple of years, is a gem.

What do you think when you look at the below graph? Would you feel confident in saying that we shouldn’t worry about sea levels rising anymore because they don’t appear to have risen in the past couple of years?

He’s really grasping at straws. Only a true denialist could get any sort of consolation out of this graph.

There’s also a discussion of this graph going on over here.

* Then again, there’s no evidence — scientific or otherwise — that it ever existed.